Dimitri Dadiomov, Global Development

Better Together

The upcoming meeting on climate change in Copenhagen will surely further motivate governments and businesses worldwide to build more renewable energy generation. That is a worthwhile goal in and of itself, but from the electric utilities’ perspective, more wind and solar will increasingly pose a challenge.

20th century utilities could not predict when demand would show up, so they built supply in the form of power plants they could control.

Today, the new renewable sources coming online such as wind and solar are not predictable, so utilities today need demand in a form they can control.

Enter electric vehicles. Consider these two numbers:

~ a wind turbine produces about 10,500 MWh per year. (1)
~ an electric vehicle (EV) requires about 3 MWh per year. (2)

If you combine the two smartly the wind turbine will power over 3,000 cars generating zero emissions.

There’s a long list of reasons most of us here at Better Place work hard to make that vision a reality. Couple the two together, and we eliminate 3,153 tailpipes and the emissions they emit. We reduce petrol use, local air pollution, and cases of asthma, bronchitis, and other unwelcome health effects. Mike Granoff did a good job summarizing the many reasons why EVs are a worthy policy priority. I want to share why EVs are the perfect complement for greater renewable power penetration.

Over the last century, electricity has been the only industry that had no such thing as inventory. Power cannot be stored in a barrel. What you use is what is produced at this very instant. The electricity powering the lights above you as you read these words was generated only moments ago, and the reality of the utility industry is that even if you had turned your monitor off, some of that unused electricity would have still been generated – and wasted.

Every grid system maintains extra power capacity online, called “active reserve,” which guarantees immediate availability of power to cover unexpected demand spikes. That margin is typically pretty small, but as we add more and more power coming from wind, sun, and wave, the margin grows. Through renewable portfolio standards and other policies, we are trying to combine already uncontrolled demand with uncontrollable supply. That poses a problem for grid operators, who inevitably generate more active reserve power to make sure that if the wind dies down right as we all come home and turn our lights, TVs, and microwaves on, we don’t have a blackout.

Not only does Better Place make sure that all EVs don’t start charging at that very time, compounding the problem, but we are building the architecture that will enable EVs to charge smartly and represent intelligent demand for the utility, demand that turns on at night while you sleep, exactly at the time when the utility has extra power that would go to waste. This software system is at the heart of the Better Place network.

EVs can charge smartly and help utilities bring more renewable energy online faster, something we need to remember as we approach Copenhagen later this year. If we take 2 million cars and couple them with 635 wind turbines, we not only help transition beyond oil, but we help the utility transition beyond coal. EVs and renewables are better together!

###

(1) Assuming 3 MW capacity, 40% capacity factor and 10% transmission losses
(2) Assuming 4 miles per kWh for a vehicle that drives 12,000 miles per year

  • chech your email sir

  • Please give me more information. I love it, Thanks again.

  • andrebastien

    3 MWh per year for 12 000 miles, gives 0.25 kWh per mile which is realistic.

    But "4Wh per mile" as written in note (2) is an error.

  • betterplace

    4 miles per kWh (as in note 2) is the same as .25 kWh per mile.

  • andrebastien

    Yes but ... the note (2) is written the other way on the Web site (16x greater!):

    "(2) Assuming 4 kWh per mile for a vehicle that drives 12,000 miles per year"

    not 4 miles per kWh as you intend to write!

    But anyway, your global conclusion is OK...

    Good luck with Better Place. Hope you may come to Montreal too.

    André Bastien

  • betterplace

    Ah yes - thanks! Will correct that.

  • aharonkadosh55

    as parents we need to give our children a better world, than our parents left
    us,we need to stop for a moment and see the damage that oil, it damage
    the environment, and we need to let planet earth recover

  • jger

    GDie Welt blickt nach Kopenhagen: Dort tagen vom 7. --
    18. Dezember die Regierungschefs aller Staaten im
    Rahmen der nächsten großen Klimakonferenz der
    Vereinten Nationen. Viele Hoffnungen verbinden sich
    Mit diesem Treffen: Ein Nachfolgeprotokoll zu Kyoto
    soll verabschiedet werden. Ob stirbt erfolgreich gelingt,
    hängt in hohem Maße von uns Industrienationen ab,
    die seit vielen Jahren mit IHREM energiehungrigen
    Lebensstil Ressourcen verbrauchen und unsere Lebensgrundlagen
    gefährden.
    Jedes Jahr blasen wir mehr klimaschädliche Gase in
    die Atmosphäre: Kohlendioxid (CO2) bei der Verbrennung
    von Kohle, Erdöl und Erdgas, Methan und andere
    Treibhausgase in der Landwirtschaft. Sie lassen
    zwar die Sonnenstrahlen zur Erde durch, aber die
    Wärme nicht mehr zurück ins Weltall. So heizt sich die
    Erde wie ein Gewächshaus auf.
    Die Folgen unseres Verhaltens spüren wir in vielen
    Teilen der Welt in bedrohlichem Ausmaß. Überflutungen,
    Dürrekatastrophen und Wirbelstürme häufen sich
    weit über die Wetterextreme hinaus Bekannten. Aber
    (zunachst) sind nicht wir in den Industrienationen die
    Leidtragenden dieser Entwicklung, Sondern es sind die
    Länder in Afrika und Asien, Deren Lebensstil nicht sterben
    Hauptverantwortung für den menschengemachten
    Klimawandel trägt.

  • jger

    Die Welt blickt nach Kopenhagen: Dort tagen vom 7. --
    18. Dezember die Regierungschefs aller Staaten im
    Rahmen der nächsten großen Klimakonferenz der
    Vereinten Nationen. Viele Hoffnungen verbinden sich
    Mit diesem Treffen: Ein Nachfolgeprotokoll zu Kyoto
    soll verabschiedet werden. Ob stirbt erfolgreich gelingt,
    hängt in hohem Maße von uns Industrienationen ab,
    die seit vielen Jahren mit IHREM energiehungrigen
    Lebensstil Ressourcen verbrauchen und unsere Lebensgrundlagen
    gefährden.
    Jedes Jahr blasen wir mehr klimaschädliche Gase in
    die Atmosphäre: Kohlendioxid (CO2) bei der Verbrennung
    von Kohle, Erdöl und Erdgas, Methan und andere
    Treibhausgase in der Landwirtschaft. Sie lassen
    zwar die Sonnenstrahlen zur Erde durch, aber die
    Wärme nicht mehr zurück ins Weltall. So heizt sich die
    Erde wie ein Gewächshaus auf.
    Die Folgen unseres Verhaltens spüren wir in vielen
    Teilen der Welt in bedrohlichem Ausmaß. Überflutungen,
    Dürrekatastrophen und Wirbelstürme häufen sich
    weit über die Wetterextreme hinaus Bekannten. Aber
    (zunachst) sind nicht wir in den Industrienationen die
    Leidtragenden dieser Entwicklung, Sondern es sind die
    Länder in Afrika und Asien, Deren Lebensstil nicht sterben
    Hauptverantwortung für den menschengemachten
    Klimawandel trägt.

  • aharonkadosh55

    I am proud of Israel, Israel will take down OPEC, and Israel will the first nation to move to electric vehicles, what will the Arabs do without oil,
    they will go down,

  • We are Chinese Electric Vehicle manufacture, check out vehicle here and see if we can cooperate in the futute: http://www.epower-cars.com/ind...

  • karlott

    I'm sorry I'm late coming to the party , but I gotta tell ya you're too cool to drool! I, like many have been waiting for an electric car a long time. I've been buying small cars for 30 years, including a "chevy" Sprint, built by Sazukki, that got 52 mpg in the city with the air on.[short story]
    I was selling heavy equipment in the 70's, when "they" turned off the oil. I was 50 miles from home with no gas, driving a 50' bucket truck demo, that got 5 miles to the gal.The only gas station in town open, one of the big boys, would only give me 5 dollars worth, that me got to a Holiday Inn across from a municipal utility. I stayed there 2 days and sold them 2 knuckle boom cranes.
    When I got home, a friend came by whose father had a survey company. He said come with me you gotta see this, we're going flying.
    He'd been flying for years as his father used a plane for aerials.
    From west coast central Fl. we headed out over the gulf. Once out of site of land, we saw tankers to the horizon. They where anchored, waiting, driving independents out of business and the gas price to 2 dollars a gal.
    I've told this story many times over the years and don't know if it's considered an "urban myth".
    So go man go!
    Good luck,
    Karl Ott

  • http://doclab.voyageauboutduch...

    End of coal documentary. I hope we all appreciate clean energy better.

  • leonardo1

    We need EV's and right now. I would be excited with this kind of industry churning we will see in the next 10 years or so. Wonder what the big oil companies are thinking ? Do they keep blocking legislation to get us a new industry, or will they broaden their horizons and think bigger?

  • I strongly hope that Better Place convinces many more governments and companies in Copenhagen that all "EV-on-the-street-by-year-X" targets are too modest and need to be increased and supported with better tax breaks, credits, subsidies and investments. We in Germany should be an EV leader to match our position of being a renewable energy leader. Every country should be. I want all our current governments in the world to become the greenest and cleanest we had so far in each country. That can be the only goal making sense for the survival of our planet.

  • ybrandstetter

    Assuming 3 MW capacity, 40% capacity factor and 10% transmission losses
    Reality is that land-based turbines are more likely to be 2MW max, and 40% is very, very optimistic. 25% is more like it.
    On the other hand, wind does not die down all at once everywhere, and wind patterns are reasobably predictable for specific locales.

blog comments powered by Disqus